第 1/2 張圖片


圖片庫
第 1/2 張圖片


有類似物品要出售?
The Teaching Archive A New History For Literary Study 56A1
US $17.00
大約HK$ 132.31
或講價
狀況:
“Book in overall good condition.May have some shelf wear bumps to edgesPlease review pictures for ”... 閱讀更多內容關於物品狀況
很好
曾被閱讀過的書籍,但狀況良好。封面不存在明顯損壞,精裝本書籍含書皮。不存在缺頁或內頁受損,無褶皺或破損,同時也沒有對文字標注/標記,或在留白處書寫內容。內封面上標記可能極少。書籍的磨損和破損程度也很低。
庫存 7 件賣出 3 件
Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.
Refresh your browser window to try again.
運送:
US $3.99(大約 HK$ 31.05) Standard Shipping.
所在地:Belton, Missouri, 美國
送達日期:
估計於 10月10日 (星期五)至 10月15日 (星期三)之間送達 運送地點 94104
退貨:
不可退貨.
保障:
請參閱物品說明或聯絡賣家以取得詳細資料。閱覽全部詳情查看保障詳情
(不符合「eBay 買家保障方案」資格)
物品細節
- 物品狀況
- 很好
- 賣家備註
- Book Title
- Teaching Archive
- Genre
- History
- Subject
- Teaching
- ISBN
- 9780226736136
關於產品
Product Identifiers
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
ISBN-10
022673613X
ISBN-13
9780226736136
eBay Product ID (ePID)
28038667780
Product Key Features
Number of Pages
320 Pages
Publication Name
Teaching Archive : a New History for Literary Study
Language
English
Subject
General, Higher
Publication Year
2020
Type
Textbook
Subject Area
Literary Criticism, Education
Format
Trade Paperback
Dimensions
Item Height
0 in
Item Weight
15.9 Oz
Item Length
0 in
Item Width
0 in
Additional Product Features
Intended Audience
Scholarly & Professional
LCCN
2020-020789
TitleLeading
The
Reviews
The Teaching Archive shows us what we should always have known: the history of English is not the history of big books of criticism talking to other big books of criticism. Instead it is the history of students and teachers talking to each other in the classroom, where what goes on has often been quite different from what conventional histories of the discipline have assumed. Buurma and Heffernan reanimate the twentieth-century classroom, and in the process they reanimate our understanding of the profession., This remarkably well-researched, beautifully written, wise, and moving study offers the discipline of English literary studies a new account of its twentieth-century history. What would happen if we understood disciplinary history as unfolding in classrooms where literary critics worked as instructors, as well as through the field-changing books they authored? What would happen if we saw those books as themselves shaped by the everyday life of teaching? The Teaching Archive makes untenable much of the received wisdom about twentieth-century English studies; it makes silenced classroom voices audible once more., How was literature actually taught in the classroom? Historians of literary studies have scarcely touched this centrally important question. But Buurma and Heffernan explore it in depth and detail, shifting our attention away from prestigious academic critics, and refocusing on syllabi, course notes, and student papers. And they show that, outside the elite universities, literary education could be much more inclusive, experimental, offbeat, and student-centered than we imagined., The Teaching Archive raises profound questions about the relation between teaching and research [in literary studies], questions that consistently fail to be addressed by the discipline's system of professional rewards, its de facto demotion of teaching to a practice of lesser value than scholarship. . . . If the literary professoriate has sometimes forgotten what happens in the classroom, it is the great contribution of this book to remind us that without collaboration, there is no teaching, and that without teaching, the discipline has no history., Rachel Sagner Buurma and Laura Heffernan present The Teaching Archive as a commentary on the teaching materials of nine different figures. . . . Yet the book is more than a teacher's guide or a collection of scattered observations about what has worked in a classroom. It is a history of literary study pitched against the accounts of literary professionalism that have given us the sense that we should guide our thinking about literature by doctrinal statements., The Teaching Archive proposes a new disciplinary history of English studies through the teaching practices of some of its most storied scholars. . . . Tracing how methodological debates have played out in practice--not as manifestoes but as pragmatic, provisional solutions to the question of how to read, and how to learn--Buurma and Heffernan suggest that such attention might allow scholars 'to evade the deadening impasse of disciplinary autocritique.', The Teaching Archive is an exemplary piece of collaborative research and a timely tribute--in both its well-written form and material content--to the work teachers do and to the classroom as a space in which groundbreaking humanist research happens. As a book that will be read in the aftermath of 2020, it can only grow in significance. The case for the classroom as somewhere that ideas and texts are made rather than delivered seems destined to become more interesting as we stop taking that material space for granted., The Teaching Archive aims to correct the longstanding underestimation of teaching as a major part of the intellectual life of the professor. At the same time, it upends binaries between formalism and historicism, teaching and research, and scholars and critics that have long dominated our accounts of how the discipline of literary studies has evolved. Buurma and Heffernan succeed admirably in disproving the schematic that pits scholars against critics and formalists against historicists while reducing most classroom teachers to mere handmaids of some greater intellect's brilliant theory. . . . Through this series of case studies, they argue that scholars of literature and historians of literary studies alike have largely ignored teaching as a site of practice and innovation, and, crucially, that a more accurate assessment of how professors have taught literature across the full scope of institutions of higher education may help point the way forward for a discipline in crisis., Rachel Sagner Buurma and Laura Heffernan's new book, The Teaching Archive: A New History for Literary Study , aims to correct the longstanding underestimation of teaching as a major part of the intellectual life of the professor. At the same time, it upends binaries between formalism and historicism, teaching and research, and scholars and critics that have long dominated our accounts of how the discipline of literary studies has evolved. Buurma and Heffernan succeed admirably in disproving the schematic that pits scholars against critics and formalists against historicists while reducing most classroom teachers to mere handmaids of some greater intellect's brilliant theory. . . . Through this series of case studies, they argue that scholars of literature and historians of literary studies alike have largely ignored teaching as a site of practice and innovation, and, crucially, that a more accurate assessment of how professors have taught literature across the full scope of institutions of higher education may help point the way forward for a discipline in crisis., The distinction between teaching and research is a key organizing principle of academia, and the hierarchy implicit in that distinction affects the rankings of universities, the careers of professors, and the public perception of higher education. The revisionist history of literary study offered by Buurma and Heffernan brilliantly explodes this false dichotomy, showing that the college classroom provided a dynamic laboratory that was fundamental to the development of the twentieth century's most influential modes of critical theory. With the materials of classroom practice as archival evidence, Buurma and Heffernan restore a lost history of intellectual experimentation in which professors and students of all levels collaborated in the creation of the field of literary criticism. At the same time, they offer a compelling defense of the humanities as an active, integrated, and broadly accessible mode of education., This book makes a fascinating and radical claim: that the English and American literary tradition was forged not by scholarly books and articles but by classroom discussion. Thus, the belief that scholars at elite institutions publish monographs so that knowledge 'trickles down' to students and to non-elite institutions is false, and the opposite is true: the knowledge produced by the selection of course texts and rich classroom discussions of literature, particularly at non-elite institutions, 'trickles up' to inform scholarship.
Illustrated
Yes
Table Of Content
List of Figures A Note on Authorship Introduction: A New Syllabus Chapter 1 Caroline Spurgeon, The Art of Reading (1913) Chapter 2 T. S. Eliot, Modern English Literature (1916-19) Chapter 3 I. A. Richards, Practical Criticism (1925), and Edith Rickert, Scientific Analysis of Style (1926) Chapter 4 J. Saunders Redding, The Negro in American Literature (1944) and American Biographical Literature (1976) Chapter 5 Cleanth Brooks, Modern Poetry (1963), and Edmund Wilson, Literature of the Civil War (1959) Chapter 6 Josephine Miles, English 1A (1940-55) Chapter 7 Simon J. Ortiz, Native American Arts (1978) Conclusion: The Past We Need Now Acknowledgments Appendix: Archives and Collections Consulted Notes Bibliography Index
Synopsis
The Teaching Archive shows us a series of major literary thinkers in a place we seldom remember them inhabiting: the classroom. Rachel Sagner Buurma and Laura Heffernan open up "the teaching archive"--the syllabuses, course descriptions, lecture notes, and class assignments--of critics and scholars including T. S. Eliot, Caroline Spurgeon, I. A. Richards, Edith Rickert, J. Saunders Redding, Edmund Wilson, Cleanth Brooks, Josephine Miles, and Simon J. Ortiz. This new history of English rewrites what we know about the discipline by showing how students helped write foundational works of literary criticism and how English classes at community colleges and HBCUs pioneered the reading methods and expanded canons that came only belatedly to the Ivy League. It reminds us that research and teaching, which institutions often imagine as separate, have always been intertwined in practice. In a contemporary moment of humanities defunding, the casualization of teaching, and the privatization of pedagogy, The Teaching Archive offers a more accurate view of the work we have done in the past and must continue to do in the future., The Teaching Archive shows us a series of major literary thinkers in a place we seldom remember them inhabiting: the classroom. Rachel Sagner Buurma and Laura Heffernan open up "the teaching archive"-the syllabuses, course descriptions, lecture notes, and class assignments-of critics and scholars including T. S. Eliot, Caroline Spurgeon, I. A. Richards, Edith Rickert, J. Saunders Redding, Edmund Wilson, Cleanth Brooks, Josephine Miles, and Simon J. Ortiz. This new history of English rewrites what we know about the discipline by showing how students helped write foundational works of literary criticism and how English classes at community colleges and HBCUs pioneered the reading methods and expanded canons that came only belatedly to the Ivy League. It reminds us that research and teaching, which institutions often imagine as separate, have always been intertwined in practice. In a contemporary moment of humanities defunding, the casualization of teaching, and the privatization of pedagogy, The Teaching Archive offers a more accurate view of the work we have done in the past and must continue to do in the future.
LC Classification Number
PR35.B88 2020
賣家提供的物品說明
賣家信用評價 (3,626)
- i***e (1861)- 買家留下的信用評價。過去 1 個月購買已獲認證Great book and quick shipping
- Automatische feedback van eBay- 買家留下的信用評價。過去 1 個月Bestelling op tijd geleverd zonder problemen
- Automatische feedback van eBay- 買家留下的信用評價。過去 1 個月Bestelling op tijd geleverd zonder problemen