第 1/1 張圖片
圖片庫
第 1/1 張圖片
有類似物品要出售？
GEORGES FLOROVSKY AND THE RUSSIAN RELIGIOUS RENAISSANCE By Paul Gavrilyuk, 2014
US $9.43
大約HK$ 73.40
接受講價
或講價
狀況：
很好
曾被閱讀過的書籍，但狀況良好。封面不存在明顯損壞，精裝本書籍含書皮。不存在缺頁或內頁受損，無褶皺或破損，同時也沒有對文字標注/標記，或在留白處書寫內容。內封面上標記可能極少。書籍的磨損和破損程度也很低。
Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.
Refresh your browser window to try again.
運送：
US $5.97（大約 HK$ 46.47） USPS Media MailTM.
所在地：Glen Allen, Virginia, 美國
送達日期：
估計於 10月3日 (星期五)至 10月9日 (星期四)之間送達 運送地點 94104
退貨：
不可退貨.
保障：
請參閱物品說明或聯絡賣家以取得詳細資料。閱覽全部詳情查看保障詳情
（不符合「eBay 買家保障方案」資格）
物品細節
- 物品狀況
- Book Title
- Georges Florovsky and the Russian Religious Renaissance (Changing
- ISBN-10
- 0198701586
- Genre
- RELIGION
- ISBN
- 9780198701583
關於產品
Product Identifiers
Publisher
Oxford University Press, Incorporated
ISBN-10
0198701586
ISBN-13
9780198701583
eBay Product ID (ePID)
171781938
Product Key Features
Number of Pages
320 Pages
Language
English
Publication Name
Georges Florovsky and the Russian Religious Renaissance
Subject
Christian Theology / General, General, History
Publication Year
2014
Type
Textbook
Subject Area
Religion
Series
Changing Paradigms in Historical and Systematic Theology Ser.
Format
Hardcover
Dimensions
Item Height
1.1 in
Item Weight
24.7 Oz
Item Length
9.4 in
Item Width
6.4 in
Additional Product Features
Intended Audience
Scholarly & Professional
LCCN
2013-944497
Dewey Edition
23
Reviews
"Paul Gavrilyuk's meticulously documented book is a model study of the intellectual development of one of the most significant and intriguing personalities of modern Orthodoxy, a masterly undertaking which will influence any further reflection on the complex development and interrelationships among the various strands of modern Orthodox theology. The book does justice to Florovsky, not as uncritical hagiography, but as a lucid, informed account of his intellectual development and his place in the history of modern Orthodox thought." --Paul Ladouceur, St Vladimir's Theological Quarterly "It will not be possible, from now on, to read Russian theologian Georges Florovsky's work or for that matter, anything about him without reference to Paul Gavrilyuk's truly groundbreaking study and reassessment." --Michael Plekon, Logos "Gavrilyuk's study provides us with the most comprehensive, broad, and critical consideration of the complex and not yet fully understood relationship between Florovsky and the Renaissance movement." --Nikolaos Asproulis, Journal of Theological Studies, "Paul Gavrilyuk's meticulously documented book is a model study of the intellectual development of one of the most significant and intriguing personalities of modern Orthodoxy, a masterly undertaking which will influence any further reflection on the complex development and interrelationships among the various strands of modern Orthodox theology. The book does justice to Florovsky, not as uncritical hagiography, but as a lucid, informed account of his intellectual development and his place in the history of modern Orthodox thought." --Paul Ladouceur, St Vladimir's Theological Quarterly "It will not be possible, from now on, to read Russian theologian Georges Florovsky's work or for that matter, anything about him without reference to Paul Gavrilyuk's truly groundbreaking study and reassessment." --Michael Plekon, Logos "Gavrilyuk's study provides us with the most comprehensive, broad, and critical consideration of the complex and not yet fully understood relationship between Florovsky and the Renaissance movement." --Nikolaos Asproulis, Journal of Theological Studies "In short, Gavrilyuk's monograph is an indispensable study of the Russian religious renaissance and certainly a welcome corrective to a facile anti-westernism that oft en characterizes Orthodox thought." --Slavic Review
Dewey Decimal
281.9/47
Table Of Content
PrefaceIntroduction1. The Russian Religious Renaissance before the Revolution2. Early Encounters with the Renaissance3. The Fathers and Children of the Renaissance in the Dispersion4. The Eurasian Temptation5. Philosophy of History6. Reevaluation of Solovyov7. Bulgakov s Antipode8. The Sophiological Subtext of Neopatristic Synthesis9. How The Ways of Russian Theology Came to Be Written10. The Patristic Norm and the Western Pseudomorphosis of Russian Theology11. The Early Reception of The Ways of Russian Theology12. Christian Hellenism as Philosophia Perennis13. The Ecclesiological and Epistemological Contours of the Neopatristic Synthesis14. The Reception of Florovsky in Orthodox Theology15. Beyond the Polarizing Narrative
Synopsis
Georges Florovsky is the mastermind of a "return to the Church Fathers" in twentieth-century Orthodox theology. His theological vision - the neopatristic synthesis - became the main paradigm of Orthodox theology and the golden standard of Eastern Orthodox identity in the West. Focusing on Florovsky's European period (1920-1948), this study analyses how Florovsky's evolving interpretation of Russian religious thought, particularly Vladimir Solovyov and Sergius Bulgakov, informed his approach to patristic sources. Paul Gavrilyuk offers a new reading of Florovsky's neopatristic theology, by closely considering its ontological, epistemological and ecclesiological foundations. It is common to contrast Florovsky's neopatristic theology with the 'modernist' religious philosophies of Pavel Florensky, Sergius Bulgakov, and other representatives of the Russian Religious Renaissance. Gavrilyuk argues that the standard narrative of twentieth-century Orthodox theology, based on this polarization, must be reconsidered. The author demonstrates Florovsky's critical appropriation of the main themes of the Russian Religious Renaissance, including theological antinomies, the meaning of history, and the nature of personhood. The distinctive features of Florovsky's neopatristic theology - Christological focus, "ecclesial experience", personalism, and "Christian Hellenism" 1 - are best understood against the background of the main problematic of the Renaissance. Specifically, it is shown that Bulgakov's sophiology provided a polemical subtext for Florovsky's theology of creation. It is argued that the use of the patristic norm in application to modern Russian theology represents Florovsky's theological signature.Drawing on unpublished archival material and correspondence, this study sheds new light on such aspects of Florovsky's career as his family background, his participation in the Eurasian movement, his dissertation on Alexander Herzen, his lectures on Vladimir Solovyov, and his involvement in Bulgakov's Brotherhood of St Sophia., Georges Florovsky is the mastermind of a 'return to the Church Fathers' in twentieth-century Orthodox theology. His theological vision-the neopatristic synthesis-became the main paradigm of Orthodox theology and the golden standard of Eastern Orthodox identity in the West. Focusing on Florovsky's European period (1920-1948), this study analyses how Florovsky's evolving interpretation of Russian religious thought, particularly Vladimir Solovyov and Sergius Bulgakov, informed his approach to patristic sources. Paul Gavrilyuk offers a new reading of Florovsky's neopatristic theology, by closely considering its ontological, epistemological and ecclesiological foundations. It is common to contrast Florovsky's neopatristic theology with the 'modernist' religious philosophies of Pavel Florensky, Sergius Bulgakov, and other representatives of the Russian Religious Renaissance. Gavrilyuk argues that the standard narrative of twentieth-century Orthodox theology, based on this polarization, must be reconsidered. The author demonstrates Florovsky's critical appropriation of the main themes of the Russian Religious Renaissance, including theological antinomies, the meaning of history, and the nature of personhood. The distinctive features of Florovsky's neopatristic theology--Christological focus, 'ecclesial experience', personalism, and 'Christian Hellenism'--are best understood against the background of the main problematic of the Renaissance. Specifically, it is shown that Bulgakov's sophiology provided a polemical subtext for Florovsky's theology of creation. It is argued that the use of the patristic norm in application to modern Russian theology represents Florovsky's theological signature.Drawing on unpublished archival material and correspondence, this study sheds new light on such aspects of Florovsky's career as his family background, his participation in the Eurasian movement, his dissertation on Alexander Herzen, his lectures on Vladimir Solovyov, and his involvement in Bulgakov's Brotherhood of St Sophia., This study offers a new interpretation of twentieth-century Russian Orthodox theology by engaging the work of Georges Florovsky (1893-1979), especially his program of a 'return to the Church Fathers'., Georges Florovsky is the mastermind of a "return to the Church Fathers" in twentieth-century Orthodox theology. His theological vision--the neopatristic synthesis--became the main paradigm of Orthodox theology and the golden standard of Eastern Orthodox identity in the West. Focusing on Florovsky's European period (1920-1948), this study analyzes how Florovsky's evolving interpretation of Russian religious thought, particularly Vladimir Solovyov and Sergius Bulgakov, informed his approach to patristic sources. Paul Gavrilyuk offers a new reading of Florovsky's neopatristic theology, by closely considering its ontological, epistemological, and ecclesiological foundations. It is common to contrast Florovsky's neopatristic theology with the "modernist" religious philosophies of Pavel Florensky, Sergius Bulgakov, and other representatives of the Russian Religious Renaissance. Gavrilyuk argues that the standard narrative of twentieth-century Orthodox theology, based on this polarization, must be reconsidered. The author demonstrates Florovsky's critical appropriation of the main themes of the Russian Religious Renaissance, including theological antinomies, the meaning of history, and the nature of personhood. The distinctive features of Florovsky's neopatristic theology--Christological focus, "ecclesial experience," personalism, and "Christian Hellenism"--are best understood against the background of the main problematic of the Renaissance. Specifically, it is shown that Bulgakov's sophiology provided a polemical subtext for Florovsky's theology of creation. It is argued that the use of the patristic norm in application to modern Russian theology represents Florovsky's theological signature. Drawing on unpublished archival material and correspondence, this study sheds new light on such aspects of Florovsky's career as his family background, his participation in the Eurasian movement, his dissertation on Alexander Herzen, his lectures on Vladimir Solovyov, and his involvement in Bulgakov's Brotherhood of St Sophia.
LC Classification Number
BX493
賣家提供的物品說明
賣家信用評價 （132）
- s***k (449)- 買家留下的信用評價。過去 1 個月購買已獲認證Great seller
- eBay 自動留下信用評價- 買家留下的信用評價。過去 1 個月訂單成功完成 — 物品享追蹤服務且準時送達
- o***i (229)- 買家留下的信用評價。過去 1 個月購買已獲認證Excellent ! A+++