第 1/8 張圖片
已賣出
Ken Burns's The Civil War:Historians Respond (1996, Hardcover) Ed. Robert Toplin
狀況：
成交價：
US $4.00
大約HK$ 31.25
接受講價
運費：
所在地：University Park, Pennsylvania, 美國
送達日期：
估計於 6月21日, 五至 6月24日, 一之間送達 運送地點 43230
退貨：
保障：
請參閱物品說明或聯絡賣家以取得詳細資料。閱覽全部詳情查看保障詳情
（不符合「eBay 買家保障方案」資格）
賣家必須承擔此刊登物品的所有責任。
eBay 物品編號：185636043090
物品細節
- 物品狀況
- Book Title
- Ken Burns's The Civil War
- Topic
- Civil War
- ISBN
- 9780195093308
- Subject Area
- Performing Arts, Référence
- Publication Name
- Ken Burns's the Civil War : Historians Respond
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press, Incorporated
- Item Length
- 8.6 in
- Subject
- Television / General, General
- Publication Year
- 1996
- Type
- Not Available
- Format
- Hardcover
- Language
- English
- Item Height
- 0.9 in
- Item Weight
- 14.8 Oz
- Item Width
- 5.9 in
- Number of Pages
- 224 Pages
關於產品
Product Identifiers
Publisher
Oxford University Press, Incorporated
ISBN-10
0195093305
ISBN-13
9780195093308
eBay Product ID (ePID)
1168584
Product Key Features
Number of Pages
224 Pages
Language
English
Publication Name
Ken Burns's the Civil War : Historians Respond
Publication Year
1996
Subject
Television / General, General
Type
Not Available
Subject Area
Performing Arts, Référence
Format
Hardcover
Dimensions
Item Height
0.9 in
Item Weight
14.8 Oz
Item Length
8.6 in
Item Width
5.9 in
Additional Product Features
LCCN
95-012190
Reviews
"As a self-described 'historian of emotions,' the film maker Ken Burns probably understands the passions he evokes in academic critics of his work. Those passions pervade the essays in Ken Burns's The Civil War."--The Chronicle of Higher Education, "A lively debate with as much to say about the series specifically as about putting history on film generally.... Battle lines drawn, this contest will surely interest many moved by the phenomenal TV series and curious about the historiographical disturbances it made."--Booklist
Intended Audience
Trade
Synopsis
Ken Burns's documentary The Civil War made television history, breaking all viewing records for a PBS series. Indeed, forty million people saw it, more than the populations of the Union and the Confederacy combined. Newsweek praised it as "a stunning television documentary." For a generation of Americans, this documentary is the Civil War. Yet many professional historians criticized it sharply for ignoring the roles of minorities, pointing to a lack of women and of blacks throughout, a disregard for the aftermath of the war (particularly its legacy to race relations), a conventional emphasis on military history rather than social history, and uneven coverage of the military campaigns that gave short shrift to the bloody Western front. Ken Burns's The Civil War brings together detractors, supporters, and Ken Burns himself in a volume that will inspire readers to look again at this stunning documentary, at the way television shows history, and at the Civil War itself. Some contributors are sharply critical. In "Noble Women as Well," Catherine Clinton describes the experiences of women during the war, disguised as soldiers, working as nurses in makeshift hospitals, or besieged in caves by enemy armies, saying that Burns ignores these stories completely. Eric Foner and Leon Litwack are even more scathing, saying that the series distorts the legacy of the war by focusing on the preservation of the union, ignoring the importance the institution of slavery had to those who fought the war, and neglecting the experiences of blacks both during and after the war: out of 28 people whose postwar careers are mentioned, only two blacks, both men, are included. "Faced with the choice between historical illumination or nostalgia, Burns consistently opts for nostalgia," Foner writes. In response, C. Vann Woodward, who served as an advisor to the series, and Ken Burns himself describe their painstaking efforts to develop a sophisticated interpretation of history in The Civil War. In the process, they explore the question of whether art can, or should, substitute for history. Is the purpose of a documentary such as The Civil War to inform or to entertain? And what happens when the desire to entertain gets in the way of historical accuracy? The answer, according to Woodward, is that the unique power and responsibility of art is to bring the past to life, not to engage in historical polemics. Ken Burns's own response is a defense of his art that is as well-crafted as the series itself. He discusses the unique limitations of television: unlike written history, for example, television documentaries require specific, identifiable visual images, limiting the coverage of subjects with little pictorial documentation. Geoffrey C. Ward, the series writer, defends their choices of interpretation and coverage in the series, and pleads eloquently for greater cooperation between filmmakers and historians. And Burns praises the power of television to move, inform, and educate, pointing to its unique responsibility in an age where Americans receive more and more of their information through television and film. The Civil War sparked emotions, curiosity, debate, and a desire to learn more about this bloody crossroads in American history. Ken Burns's The Civil War is for anyone who was intrigued and touched by that monumental series, and by the even more monumental war that it illuminated., Ken Burns's documentary The Civil War made television history, breaking all viewing records for a PBS series. Indeed, forty million people saw it, more than the populations of the Union and the Confederacy combined. Newsweek praised it as "a stunning television documentary." For a generation of Americans, this documentary is the Civil War. Yet many professional historians criticized it sharply for ignoring the roles of minorities, pointing to a lack of women and of blacks throughout, a disregard for the aftermath of the war (particularly its legacy to race relations), a conventional emphasis on military history rather than social history, and uneven coverage of the military campaigns that gave short shrift to the bloody Western front. Ken Burns's The Civil War brings together detractors, supporters, and Ken Burns himself in a volume that will inspire readers to look again at this stunning documentary, at the way television shows history, and at the Civil War itself. Some contributors are sharply critical. In "Noble Women as Well," Catherine Clinton describes the experiences of women during the war, disguised as soldiers, working as nurses in makeshift hospitals, or besieged in caves by enemy armies, saying that Burns ignores these stories completely. Eric Foner and Leon Litwack are even more scathing, saying that the series distorts the legacy of the war by focusing on the preservation of the union, ignoring the importance the institution of slavery had to those who fought the war, and neglecting the experiences of blacks both during and after the war: out of 28 people whose postwar careers are mentioned, only two blacks, both men, are included. "Faced with the choice between historical illumination or nostalgia, Burns consistently opts for nostalgia," Foner writes. In response, C. Vann Woodward, who served as an advisor to the series, and Ken Burns himself describe their painstaking efforts to develop a sophisticated interpretation of history in The Civil War . In the process, they explore the question of whether art can, or should, substitute for history. Is the purpose of a documentary such as The Civil War to inform or to entertain? And what happens when the desire to entertain gets in the way of historical accuracy? The answer, according to Woodward, is that the unique power and responsibility of art is to bring the past to life, not to engage in historical polemics. Ken Burns's own response is a defense of his art that is as well-crafted as the series itself. He discusses the unique limitations of television: unlike written history, for example, television documentaries require specific, identifiable visual images, limiting the coverage of subjects with little pictorial documentation. Geoffrey C. Ward, the series writer, defends their choices of interpretation and coverage in the series, and pleads eloquently for greater cooperation between filmmakers and historians. And Burns praises the power of television to move, inform, and educate, pointing to its unique responsibility in an age where Americans receive more and more of their information through television and film. The Civil War sparked emotions, curiosity, debate, and a desire to learn more about this bloody crossroads in American history. Ken Burns's The Civil War is for anyone who was intrigued and touched by that monumental series, and by the even more monumental war that it illuminated.
LC Classification Number
E468.9.K46 1996
Copyright Date
1996
ebay_catalog_id
4
賣家提供的物品說明
賣家必須承擔此刊登物品的所有責任。
eBay 物品編號：185636043090
運費與處理費
物品所在地：
University Park, Pennsylvania, 美國
運送地點
不丹, 中國, 中國台灣, 中國澳門, 中國香港, 中非共和國, 丹麥, 乍德, 也門, 亞塞拜疆共和國, 亞美尼亞, 以色列, 伯利茲, 佛得角群島, 保加利亞, 克羅地亞共和國, 冰島, 列支敦士登, 利比利亞, 剛果共和國, 剛果民主共和國, 加拿大, 加納, 加蓬共和國, 匈牙利, 南非, 南韓, 博茨瓦納, 卡塔爾, 印尼, 印度, 危地馬拉, 厄瓜多爾, 厄立特里亞, 吉布提, 吉爾吉斯, 哈薩克, 哥倫比亞, 哥斯達黎加, 喀麥隆, 土庫斯安德凱科斯群島, 土庫曼, 土耳其, 圭亞那, 坦桑尼亞, 埃及, 埃塞俄比亞, 基里巴斯, 塔吉克, 塞內加爾, 塞拉利昂, 塞浦路斯, 塞爾維亞, 塞舌爾, 墨西哥, 多哥, 多明尼加共和國, 奧地利, 孟加拉, 安哥拉, 安圭拉島, 安提瓜和巴布達, 安道爾, 寮國, 尼加拉瓜, 尼日利亞, 尼日爾, 尼泊爾, 巴哈馬, 巴基斯坦, 巴布亞新畿內亞, 巴拉圭, 巴拿馬, 巴林, 巴西, 布基納法索, 布隆迪, 希臘, 幾內亞, 幾內亞比索, 德國, 意大利, 愛沙尼亞, 愛爾蘭, 所羅門群島, 拉脫維亞, 挪威, 捷克共和國, 摩洛哥, 摩爾多瓦, 摩納哥, 斐濟, 斯威士蘭, 斯洛伐克, 斯洛文尼亞, 斯里蘭卡, 新加坡, 日本, 智利, 柬埔寨, 格陵蘭, 格雷納達, 格魯吉亞, 梵蒂岡, 比利時, 毛里求斯, 汶萊, 沙特阿拉伯, 法國, 波斯尼亞和黑塞哥維那, 波蘭, 泰國, 津巴布韋, 洪都拉斯, 海地, 湯加, 澳洲, 烏干達, 烏拉圭, 烏茲別克, 牙買加, 特里尼達和多巴哥, 玻利維亞, 瑙魯, 瑞典, 瑞士, 瓦利斯和富圖納群島, 瓦努阿圖, 甘比亞, 百慕達群島, 盧旺達, 盧森堡, 直布羅陀, 科威特, 科特迪瓦（象牙海岸）, 秘魯, 突尼斯, 立陶宛, 約旦, 納米比亞, 紐西蘭, 羅馬尼亞, 美國, 聖基茨-尼維斯, 聖文森和格瑞那丁, 聖盧西亞, 聖馬力諾, 肯亞, 芬蘭, 英國, 茅利塔尼亞, 荷蘭, 莫桑比克, 菲律賓, 萊索托, 葡萄牙, 蒙古, 蒙特色拉特島, 薩爾瓦多, 蘇里南, 西班牙, 西薩摩亞, 貝寧, 贊比亞, 赤道幾內亞, 越南, 開曼群島, 阿富汗, 阿拉伯聯合酋長國, 阿曼, 阿根廷, 阿爾及利亞, 阿爾巴尼亞, 阿魯巴, 馬來西亞, 馬其頓, 馬拉維, 馬爾代夫, 馬耳他, 馬達加斯加, 馬里, 黎巴嫩, 黑山
排除：
俄羅斯聯邦, 利比亞, 委內瑞拉, 巴貝多, 新喀里多尼亞, 法屬圭亞那, 法屬玻里尼西亞, 烏克蘭, 瓜德羅普島, 留尼汪島, 馬提尼克島
| 運費與處理費 | 運送地點 | 運送方式 | 運送*查看送達備註 |
|---|---|---|---|
| US $4.13（大約 HK$ 32.26） | 美國 | 經濟運送方式 (USPS Media MailTM) | 估計於 6月21日, 五至 6月24日, 一之間送達 運送地點 43230 |
| 處理時間 |
|---|
| 通常會在收到所有款項後的 3 個工作日內發貨。 |
| 稅項 |
|---|
| 結賬時相關稅項可能適用。 進一步了解進一步了解為 eBay 購物繳稅。 |
物品編號 185636043090 的銷售稅
物品編號 185636043090 的銷售稅
賣家會對寄往以下各州的物品收取銷售稅：
| 州／省 | 銷售稅稅率 |
|---|
退貨政策
| 退貨政策說明 |
|---|
| 賣家不接受此物品的退貨。 |
