第 1/1 張圖片
第 1/1 張圖片
Second Over All Overview Part 2, Schutte New 9781539044352 Fast Free Shipping-,
US $27.74
大約HK$ 215.97
狀況:
全新
全新,未閱讀過和使用過的書籍,狀況完好,不存在缺頁或內頁受損。
庫存 3 件
運費:
免費 USPS Media MailTM.
所在地:MD, 美國
送達日期:
估計於 10月3日, 四至 10月8日, 二之間送達 運送地點 43230
退貨:
30 日退貨. 由買家支付退貨運費.
保障:
請參閱物品說明或聯絡賣家以取得詳細資料。閱覽全部詳情查看保障詳情
(不符合「eBay 買家保障方案」資格)
安心購物
物品細節
- 物品狀況
- 全新: 全新,未閱讀過和使用過的書籍,狀況完好,不存在缺頁或內頁受損。 查看所有物品狀況定義會在新視窗或分頁中開啟
- PublishedOn
- 2016-09-25
- Title
- Second Over All Overview Part 2
- ISBN
- 9781539044352
- Book Title
- Second over All Overview Part 2
- Publisher
- CreateSpace
- Item Length
- 11 in
- Publication Year
- 2016
- Format
- Trade Paperback
- Language
- English
- Item Height
- 0.8 in
- Genre
- Science
- Topic
- Cosmology
- Item Weight
- 36.5 Oz
- Item Width
- 8.5 in
- Number of Pages
- 362 Pages
關於產品
Product Identifiers
Publisher
CreateSpace
ISBN-10
1539044351
ISBN-13
9781539044352
eBay Product ID (ePID)
229551477
Product Key Features
Book Title
Second over All Overview Part 2
Number of Pages
362 Pages
Language
English
Topic
Cosmology
Publication Year
2016
Genre
Science
Format
Trade Paperback
Dimensions
Item Height
0.8 in
Item Weight
36.5 Oz
Item Length
11 in
Item Width
8.5 in
Additional Product Features
Intended Audience
Trade
Synopsis
Notwithstanding the pose Mainstream physics tries to uphold, the entirety of physics still use the idea of magical forces intervening in nature and they still base concepts on unexplained novelties. To say the least, the concepts physics use in terms of Newton would not even be acceptable to children in the modern informed era we live in, I challenge any person to prove Newton, not to accept Newton but to undoubtedly prove Newton correct! I recognised the impossible double standards Mainstream physics apply to promote their much shady explaining. In short I tested Newton's principles and found the principles to be wanting. A line or spot starting at zero would be shorter than the shortest line possible. For obvious reasons can no line, or any line grow or extend from zero because such a line must then quit zero and become something, thus abandon its original value. When any line is starting from point zero it can never leave zero because of the influence of being zero disqualifies any possibility of growth. If the line then had to grow in all directions at the same pace the line must therefore be a circle or being three-dimensional, a sphere. The inconsistencies Newton introduced brought science double vision and to compensate for these bogus truths supporting their incredible theories, they simplify issues to such a level where what they embark on, is the meaningless acceptance of the unproven and they proclaim to understand what are meaningless inconsistencies and to achieve this they create scenarios which use the entanglement of deception. It is as if they never read with interest that which they explain and they never scrutinise that which they advocate. It is senseless because the concept it carries became accepted as household practise and life science. The worst part is that the group of people normally considered as the wisest bunch there is, never did prudent testing on Newtonian presumptions, while to test the presumptions is most easy to do. If you think those in charge of astrophysics are the pillars of trust, then get wise by reading the following. This betrayal on their part and misusing the public's good nature to be used in schemes to get the public conned must end and I pray that this book form the first step in resisting the arrogance of the Academic Physicist' will be successful in that regard. The sifting process they named examinations. Then you better read on and I will remove your blindfold and show you what a world of deception the Academic Physicist force on us.If you are a student in the science of physics, then ask your Educated Masters to please explain the following abnormalities you are about to read in this book and insist on a clear explanation about the inconsistencies they promote while tutoring physics as if the physics they present are the most flawless and accurate institution there has ever been. Let them mathematically show how one would go about and use Newton's visionary formula to calculate the force of gravity by replacing the symbols with the actual values in mass that the items refer to have. To say the least, the concepts physics use in terms of Newton would not even be acceptable to children in the modern informed era we live in, I challenge any person to prove Newton, not to accept Newton but to undoubtedly prove Newton correct! It is as if they never read with interest that which they explain and they never scrutinise that which they advocate. It is senseless because the concept it carries became accepted as household practise and life science. You are about to discover science that was hiding in plane sight ever since man discovered science. What singularity is?Where to locate singularityWhat truly formed the Universe?What is the Titius Bode law? Resolving the Titius Bode lawStill science reject these laws and thereby reject nature in favour of Newton...and nature does not provide any inclination as to where Newton or his ideas could be found working., Notwithstanding the pose Mainstream physics tries to uphold, the entirety of physics still use the idea of magical forces intervening in nature and they still base concepts on unexplained novelties. To say the least, the concepts physics use in terms of Newton would not even be acceptable to children in the modern informed era we live in, I challenge any person to prove Newton, not to accept Newton but to undoubtedly prove Newton correct I recognised the impossible double standards Mainstream physics apply to promote their much shady explaining. In short I tested Newton's principles and found the principles to be wanting. A line or spot starting at zero would be shorter than the shortest line possible. For obvious reasons can no line, or any line grow or extend from zero because such a line must then quit zero and become something, thus abandon its original value. When any line is starting from point zero it can never leave zero because of the influence of being zero disqualifies any possibility of growth. If the line then had to grow in all directions at the same pace the line must therefore be a circle or being three-dimensional, a sphere. The inconsistencies Newton introduced brought science double vision and to compensate for these bogus truths supporting their incredible theories, they simplify issues to such a level where what they embark on, is the meaningless acceptance of the unproven and they proclaim to understand what are meaningless inconsistencies and to achieve this they create scenarios which use the entanglement of deception. It is as if they never read with interest that which they explain and they never scrutinise that which they advocate. It is senseless because the concept it carries became accepted as household practise and life science. The worst part is that the group of people normally considered as the wisest bunch there is, never did prudent testing on Newtonian presumptions, while to test the presumptions is most easy to do. If you think those in charge of astrophysics are the pillars of trust, then get wise by reading the following. This betrayal on their part and misusing the public's good nature to be used in schemes to get the public conned must end and I pray that this book form the first step in resisting the arrogance of the Academic Physicist' will be successful in that regard. The sifting process they named examinations. Then you better read on and I will remove your blindfold and show you what a world of deception the Academic Physicist force on us. If you are a student in the science of physics, then ask your Educated Masters to please explain the following abnormalities you are about to read in this book and insist on a clear explanation about the inconsistencies they promote while tutoring physics as if the physics they present are the most flawless and accurate institution there has ever been. Let them mathematically show how one would go about and use Newton's visionary formula to calculate the force of gravity by replacing the symbols with the actual values in mass that the items refer to have. To say the least, the concepts physics use in terms of Newton would not even be acceptable to children in the modern informed era we live in, I challenge any person to prove Newton, not to accept Newton but to undoubtedly prove Newton correct It is as if they never read with interest that which they explain and they never scrutinise that which they advocate. It is senseless because the concept it carries became accepted as household practise and life science. You are about to discover science that was hiding in plane sight ever since man discovered science. What singularity is? Where to locate singularity What truly formed the Universe? What is the Titius Bode law? Resolving the Titius Bode law Still science reject these laws and thereby reject nature in favour of Newton...and nature does not provide any inclination as to where Newton or his ideas could be found working
賣家提供的物品說明
商業賣家資料
增值稅識別編號:
- GB 724498118
此商店的熱門類別
賣家信用評價 (521,064)
- y***o (2420)- 買家留下的信用評價。過去 1 個月購買已獲認證Thanks, very nice.
- r***d (29)- 買家留下的信用評價。過去 1 個月購買已獲認證Great packaging and the book is in amazing shape looks brand new