第 1/1 張圖片
第 1/1 張圖片
Misreading the Public : The Myth of a New Isolationism, Hardcover by Kull, St...
US $49.63
大約HK$ 386.39
狀況：
很新
狀況完好的書籍。封面發亮且沒有損壞，精裝本書籍含書皮。不存在缺頁或內頁受損，無褶皺或破損，同時也沒有對文字標注/標記，或在留白處書寫內容。內封面上標記極少。書籍的磨損和破損程度也很低。
運費：
免費 Economy Shipping.
所在地：Jessup, Maryland, 美國
送達日期：
估計於 10月8日, 二至 10月15日, 二之間送達 運送地點 43230
退貨：
14 日退貨. 由買家支付退貨運費.
保障：
請參閱物品說明或聯絡賣家以取得詳細資料。閱覽全部詳情查看保障詳情
（不符合「eBay 買家保障方案」資格）
物品細節
- 物品狀況
- 很新: 狀況完好的書籍。封面發亮且沒有損壞，精裝本書籍含書皮。不存在缺頁或內頁受損，無褶皺或破損，同時也沒有對文字標注/標記，或在留白處書寫內容。內封面上標記極少。書籍的磨損和破損程度也很低。 查看所有物品狀況定義會在新視窗或分頁中開啟
- Book Title
- Misreading the Public : The Myth of a New Isolationism
- ISBN
- 9780815717669
- Subject Area
- Political Science
- Publication Name
- Misreading the Public : the Myth of a New Isolationism
- Publisher
- Brookings Institution Press
- Item Length
- 9 in
- Subject
- American Government / Legislative Branch, International Relations / General, International Relations / Diplomacy
- Publication Year
- 1999
- Type
- Textbook
- Format
- Hardcover
- Language
- English
- Item Weight
- 1.4 Oz
- Item Width
- 6 in
- Number of Pages
- 330 Pages
關於產品
Product Identifiers
Publisher
Brookings Institution Press
ISBN-10
0815717660
ISBN-13
9780815717669
eBay Product ID (ePID)
1005990
Product Key Features
Number of Pages
330 Pages
Language
English
Publication Name
Misreading the Public : the Myth of a New Isolationism
Publication Year
1999
Subject
American Government / Legislative Branch, International Relations / General, International Relations / Diplomacy
Type
Textbook
Subject Area
Political Science
Format
Hardcover
Dimensions
Item Weight
1.4 Oz
Item Length
9 in
Item Width
6 in
Additional Product Features
Intended Audience
Scholarly & Professional
LCCN
98-040102
Reviews
"...a deeply insightful discussion of American concerns with multilateralism." --Jonathan D. Tepperman, Washington Monthly, Washington Monthly
Illustrated
Yes
Synopsis
Through extensive interviews with members of the policy community, the authors of this text reveal a pervasive belief that, in the wake of the Cold War, the public is showing a new isolation: opposition to foreign aid and hostility to the United Nations., Do American policymakers really know what the American public wants in U.S. foreign policy? Through extensive interviews with members of the policy community, the authors reveal a pervasive belief--especially in Congress--that, in the wake of the cold war, the public is showing a new isolationism: opposition to foreign aid, hostility to the United Nations, and aversion to contributing U.S. troops to peacekeeping operations. This view of the public has in turn had a significant impact on U.S. foreign policy. However, through a comprehensive review of polling data, as well as focus groups, the authors show that all these beliefs about the public are myths. The public does complain that the United States is playing the role of dominant world leader more than it should, but this does not lead to a desire to withdraw. Instead people prefer to share responsibility with other nations, particularly through the UN. The authors offer explanations of how such a misperception can occur and suggest ways to improve communication between the public and policymakers, including better presentation of polling data and more attention by practitioners to a wider public., Do American policymakers really know what the American public wants in U.S. foreign policy? Through extensive interviews with members of the policy community, the authors reveal a pervasive belief--especially in Congress--that, in the wake of the cold war, the public is showing a new isolationism: opposition to foreign aid, hostility to the United Nations, and aversion to contributing U.S. troops to peacekeeping operations. This view of the public has in turn had a significant impact on U.S. foreign policy. However, through a comprehensive review of polling data, as well as focus groups, the authors show that all these beliefs about the public are myths. The public does complain that the United States is playing the role of dominant world leader more than it should, but this does not lead to a desire to withdraw. Instead people prefer to share responsibility with other nations, particularly through the UN. The authors offer explanations of how such a misperception can occur and suggest ways to improve communication between the public and policymakers, including better presentation of polling data and more attention by practitioners to a wider public.
LC Classification Number
E840.K85 1999
賣家提供的物品說明
賣家信用評價 （353,588）
- j***o (297)- 買家留下的信用評價。過去 1 個月購買已獲認證this was a awesome seller with great communication thank you 🙏🏼
- e***l (1554)- 買家留下的信用評價。過去 1 個月購買已獲認證AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA++++++++++++++++++++
- e***l (1554)- 買家留下的信用評價。過去 1 個月購買已獲認證AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA+++++++++++++++++